icesus

I'm missing the point here. If the spells spcost was lowered, but the spdrain is still the same (It seems that way to me, but it might be effective-after-reboot) then this change doesn't make any sense. If you cast invis, you'll lose sps from spcost which is below 5% with reasonable spmax and after ...

So a mage cant solo, well neither can a air priest. And a low level militia player is quite useless for party. Sorry, that I have to get picky, but Air priests can solo relatively well after you get to level 50+ and start getting working life boost, both heal&off-spells and haste. And militia i...

mage.icesus.org Easy to type at least.

Well suppose you now are allowed to kill mob#2 from the same room I'm fighting mob#1 at the same time and there's n mobs at that room. You enter the room, see my party fighting mob#1 while other mobs are standing still. Then you see "Grainer blabs: Shoo!" and think "what the hell make...

The history story where all the gods are present might be the actual thing that happened, but still priests of one deity could easily believe that their god is the only one that there is. Like (fundamental) christians believe that their god is the only one there is.

Actually tanks use sps: templars cast spells and BoJ uses sps, rangers have a sub full of spells, sd:s have barrier, etc. Only melee-guild that doesn't use spells (from own subs and that I know of) is militia, but it's ment that way.

well...not a mainguild == subguild

Why use made-up-names when there are some that players have been using for long time? As far as I know "open sub" has always meen called as "open sub" (for example chrono's are NOT minor sub for me, they are so useful) and if it's a sub for a mainguild, then it's called "mil...

Yep, it would not only help to pick right sub, but prevent disappointments after spending that *huge* amount of exp on a level only to see that the cool-named skill does no good to you and you'd have been better of spending the exp on skills that you could train on previous level.

belannaer wrote:Christians might come to kick our butts and whine that we copied their fictional characters

Now THAT'S something I'd REALLY LIKE TO steal to my plan/sig/etc. :DDDD

Well if you'd take damage when you hit someone with a 2-meter-long-greatsword there need to be some damn long spikes in the armour. So I don't think that attacker takes dam. thing would be good unless it's only for unarmed combat and maybe against daggers, knives, etc.

aaeli wrote:I never understood why those idling templars didnt just set a trigger to let people in. I know with my client it is very easy to do.

Maybe because they've read 'help triggers'

Heh, nice try, tanstai But I don't think it would be too hard to figure out an estimate for the formula...

That would make them really useful in parties, like a kind of deftank to defeat magic-using mobs. Very difficult to balance (at least the way I think of balance) but a nice feature. Not very hard to balance if anti-magicist cannot party with any magic-users ,) edit quotes right and why does it say ...

let it affect all but one of the elements, so certain of these members could work with the air priests, or maybe the earth priests. This would be just an artificial exception to the basic guild idea. I think it would be better if no one could cast spells in the same room where anti-magician is. Tha...