updated keep command?

[comas]

This might sound a little strange, but this is just another upgrade to already available commands.

Personally I use 3 sacks, one for hearts, one for my stuff and another for loot...

most of the time, my stuff and heart sacks are empty whilst the loot gets pretty full... now, wouldnt it be nice to have somethign like

Keep all in <container>
and when you did a look at <container> you d get the same message ordered by keep status as you get with inventory?
This way i could just keep all my stuff , specifying from container also, and then fill everything up and sell ( sell all from <cont>) without worries of selling my stuff...

This is a little diferent than the "keep to container" flag that could work if all my stuff were to be outside of container on the moment of the keep.

Just a thought. comments / bashing welcome.

[solarin]

bash,bash bash!

[pyrana]

Being able to determine what items in a container are currently set to keep would be a useful addition to the keep command.

I concur!

nudge, bash, flame!