Train!
Moderator: Moderators
Just because steam wasnt invented until the 1800's in our world, doesnt mean that icesus doesnt have that technology. And the train would only make a few stops, its not like you can jump off the train anywhere you want. For example, you could have the train go to atherton and back to vaerlon. And a fee is probably a good idea.
- artic
- Supporting Member 2005
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 15:54 pm
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Instead of trians, a quite more easyer thing could be created.
Rentable mounts.
You rent a mount only for a short time. Speeding up your travels quite easyly and you also might get sligthly better at riding (making it far more easy for you to one day buy your own mount). So instead of paying 100k+feats for a mount, pay some 10-15k for the use of a mount for one boot. if you dont return the mount, you will be fined and you wont be able to rent another mount until you have payed the fine.
This would also make mounts more popular amongst lower level players.
Rentable mounts.
You rent a mount only for a short time. Speeding up your travels quite easyly and you also might get sligthly better at riding (making it far more easy for you to one day buy your own mount). So instead of paying 100k+feats for a mount, pay some 10-15k for the use of a mount for one boot. if you dont return the mount, you will be fined and you wont be able to rent another mount until you have payed the fine.
This would also make mounts more popular amongst lower level players.
Fine isn't enough, you shouldn't be able to use any stable services from any stables(for saving mount) until you have paid the fine, otherwise ppl would get very cheap wyverns or horsesSo instead of paying 100k+feats for a mount, pay some 10-15k for the use of a mount for one boot. if you dont return the mount, you will be fined and you wont be able to rent another mount until you have payed the fine.
This is true, only basic mounts should be available. Though I won't code such thing anyways, so my opinion matter just about as much as yours.felgand wrote:If there is going to be a rent system, it shouldn't include any mounts other than the cheapest horses/ponies/mules...so no land wyverns at all. :P
how about this, if you are not a part of a specific guild or subguild, you can only rent the worst of the worst in mounts, but if you are in the guild or subguild, then you can rent better animals depending on the level you are in, up to the biggest horse? and if you are too small for a horse, or too large, there would be things you could do, like dog or maybe mammoth.
- artic
- Supporting Member 2005
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 15:54 pm
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia
This solution is not perfect. It does however have its advantages. I too agree that only the low price mounts should/could be available for rent. If you want a exotic mount, or an expensive warhorse, you must buy it. Renting should not be an abuse that enables you to get good mounts for little money, but a way to get mount for low level and low finances players. And as a bonus a way to boost your riding skills to one day buy a real mount.
If you manage to kill your rental mount...
The same thing happens that happens in the real world when you wreck your rental. You pay for it. If you don't have enough money..you get removed! (No insurance!)
Ok, maybe not removed but automatically when you sell your items on normal shops, 75-90% of the income would go straight to cover your debt. Should you sell your stuff on...more shady markets, this would not happen.
The same thing happens that happens in the real world when you wreck your rental. You pay for it. If you don't have enough money..you get removed! (No insurance!)
Ok, maybe not removed but automatically when you sell your items on normal shops, 75-90% of the income would go straight to cover your debt. Should you sell your stuff on...more shady markets, this would not happen.